Baby Killer Susan Smith’s Crocodile Tears Did NOT Move Parole Board
On November 20, 2024, Susan Smith, who was convicted in 1995 for the drowning deaths of her two young sons, was denied parole by the South Carolina Board of Paroles. This decision came after Smith’s first parole hearing since her incarceration nearly three decades ago.
Background of the Case
In October 1994, Susan Smith reported that her vehicle had been carjacked by an unknown Black man, with her sons, 3-year-old Michael and 14-month-old Alexander, inside. The case garnered national attention as Smith made public pleas for their safe return. However, nine days later, she confessed to strapping her children into their car seats and allowing the car to roll into John D. Long Lake in Union County, South Carolina, resulting in their deaths. Smith’s actions and the subsequent revelation of her fabricated story shocked the nation and led to widespread media coverage.
Parole Hearing Details
During the parole hearing, Smith, now 53, appeared via video link from Leath Correctional Institution. She expressed remorse, stating, “I know that what I did was horrible. And I would give anything if I could go back and change it.” She also mentioned her Christian faith, saying, “I am a Christian and I know that God has forgiven me.”
Despite her expressions of remorse, the parole board unanimously voted to deny her parole. Factors influencing their decision included Smith’s disciplinary record during her incarceration, which comprises multiple infractions such as drug use, self-mutilation, and inappropriate relationships with prison staff.
Reactions from Family and Legal Representatives
David Smith, Susan’s ex-husband and father of the deceased children, opposed her release. He emphasized the deliberate nature of her actions and questioned her rehabilitation, stating that 30 years was not a sufficient punishment for the loss of their sons.
Tommy Pope, the former lead prosecutor in the case, also argued against her parole, describing her tearful demeanor as insincere and highlighting the calculated nature of her crimes.
Future Parole Opportunities
Under South Carolina law, inmates serving life sentences are eligible for parole hearings every two years after serving 30 years. Therefore, Susan Smith will have the opportunity to apply for parole again in November 2026. This process necessitates ongoing advocacy from the family of her deceased sons to contest her release and ensure she remains incarcerated.
Conclusion
The denial of Susan Smith’s parole reflects the parole board’s assessment of her actions and behavior during incarceration. As the case continues to evoke strong emotions, it underscores the complexities involved in parole decisions for individuals convicted of heinous crimes. The upcoming parole hearings will likely continue to draw public attention and debate.
Sources
