The Good Wives’ Network YouTube

The Good Wives' Network

The Good Wives’ Network is programming for women run exclusively by women. Our content line up will include: honest true-crime shows without the sensationalism, cooking shows, advice shows for all types of moms, educational programing, a wellnes center, and even some political debates. Our mission is to provide video content that women not only want to watch but it engages our body, hearts, and minds.

There's Always 3 Sides to Every Story And Audrey I Think That Other Side is Ready to Talk.....

The GFM that Morbid put up last night from a year ago was a joke.

Last week, deputies executing a search warrant in the tiny village of Hamden uncovered 16 children living in squalor, confined to a single 12-by-12-foot room
. Four family members were arrested, including the children's parents, Gary Siders Jr. and Elizabeth Siders, who face felony child endangerment charges
.
But if you look closely at the court record, a striking detail appears: Elizabeth Siders is 33 years old, and her oldest child was born on May 30th, 2008
. This means she was only 15 years old when she gave birth to her first child. Her defense attorney, Thomas Stolly, also confirmed his understanding that she was married to her husband at that same age
.
This timeline raises incredibly difficult questions:
How does our legal system balance severe adult neglect with a defendant’s history of childhood trauma, grooming, and continuous isolation?
Does entering a highly controlling family unit as a minor diminish a parent’s legal duty of care under Ohio Revised Code 2919.22
?
Watch the full breakdown to see both sides of this developing case.
👇 Where do we draw the line between understanding why something happened, and holding someone accountable for what happened? Let’s talk about it in the comments (keep it civil).
#SidersCase #Ohio #TrueCrime #CurrentEvents #Discussion #ChildAdvocacy #LawAndJustice

The Siders child endangerment case in Vinton County, Ohio has shocked the nation.

TT Replay Live 7-5-26 Audrey Lies Some More & Other Shady Shit in The Gypverse Community

Imagine launching hate campaigns on people for asking the questions you weren't. The look on mom's face in the car said it all. Now you are blaming mom for your actions and begging CC not to report the truth. Don't FAFO with the OGs. We don't play.

Liar Liar Pants on Fire Audrey but I Don't Think Your Momma's House Was.

In this standalone investigative sidebar, we dissect the administrative, legal, and logical collapse of the military cheating and domestic abuse claims made by Audrey Smith.
When we evaluate her modern-day comments against the public military record and the text of Chapter 18 of her book, her narrative completely implodes under the weight of four massive contradictions:
The Sleeping Assault: Audrey attempts to frame herself as a victim of domestic violence, claiming she has "police reports" of Colt's abuse. However, her book reveals that she was the primary physical aggressor on the night of their major blowout. She admits that while Colt lay asleep, she tiptoed into his room and punched him in the face. There would have been a military police incident report filed on her as the physical assailant.
The Kids Weren't Home Cop-Out: Audrey attempts to dismiss her volatile behavior by arguing: “And a fight that happened while the kids were in state custody was failure to protect them when they weren’t there.” To get her children back from foster care, the state mandated that Audrey establish a safe, separate, and non-violent living environment. By sneaking back into Colt's bed in the middle of the night, she proved her "separate apartment" was a complete fraud designed to deceive CPS, demonstrating the literal legal definition of a failure to protect.
The Prosecutorial Sweep: Audrey boasts about forwarding Colt's explicit photos to his entire military company
. Under the UCMJ, this constitutes non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images. Rather than entangling their trial in a complex, multi-party legal circus involving a civilian spouse's cybercrime, military prosecutors made a calculated, standard decision: they swept the cheating and revenge porn under the rug to secure a clean, focused conviction against Colt Smith under Article 124 (Maiming) and Article 128 (Aggravated Assault) of his 23-day-old infant.
The E-3 PFC Command Myth: To make the affair sound like an abuse of rank, Audrey claims the other woman was a "military subordinate under his direct command"
. However, Colt's official appellate sheet proves his rank was Private First Class (PFC / E-3). A PFC has zero subordinates and commands absolutely no one. This was not a command-level exploitation; it was a highly volatile, mutually violent marriage between two low-ranking junior enlisted peers.
By comparing her spoken words directly to her written text and the public legal records, we expose a highly calculated behavioral pattern of shifting alibis to maintain online sympathy and escape historical accountability.

Substantiated Preview: Audrey Digs Herself a Bigger Hole

Audrey You Just Admitted to Serious Crimes

$The Administrative Reality of the UCMJ vs. 'Wards of the State' In this video, we dissect the administrative, legal, and logical collapse of the military and domestic abuse claims made by Audrey Viecelli (Smith) in her book Wards of the State and her recent defensive video, Proof Beats Gossip Every Time . When we evaluate her modern-day claims against the public military record, her narrative completely implodes under the weight of three massive contradictions: The Prosecutorial Sweep: Audrey displays her official military witness statement documenting her husband's "porn incident" with a subordinate to prove she was telling the truth . However, she also boasts about forwarding these explicit nudes to his entire military company . Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), this act constitutes non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images. Rather than entangling their prosecution in a messy, dual-party legal circus involving a civilian spouse's cybercrime, the military made a calculated, prosecutorial decision: they swept the messy interpersonal drama under the rug to secure a clean, focused conviction against Colt Smith under Article 124 (Maiming) and Article 128 (Aggravated Assault) of his 23-day-old infant . The Mutual Combat Admission: To defend her choice to stay married to her infant's primary abuser, Audrey claims she was also a victim of domestic violence but admits on camera that the military jury didn't find Colt guilty of assaulting her because "I hit him as well" . By her own mouth, she admits her household was a highly volatile, physical battleground. Under child welfare law, introducing a newborn baby into a mutually violent, physically combative home and leaving him unsupervised with a violent partner is the exact legal definition of "Failure to Protect" and "Lack of Supervision"—the very findings she has spent 14 years claiming were a state conspiracy . The Courthouse Promotion Myth: Audrey claims that high-ranking military sergeants sat in the courthouse waiting room during Colt's child abuse trial, "fervently filling out paperwork for his promotion" . Under military law, any service member actively facing a general court-martial is placed on an immediate, non-negotiable administrative legal hold, completely freezing and blocking all promotion actions. The military would never draft promotion recommendations for an E-3 on trial for fracturing an infant's skull and ribs . By comparing her spoken words directly to the public legal records, we expose a highly calculated behavioral pattern of shifting alibis to maintain online sympathy and escape historical accountability. Let's read the fine print.$

The Adninistrative Reality of the UCMJ vs The Wards of the State.

The Administrative Reality of the UCMJ V. Wards of the State